Welcome! These forums will be deactivated by the end of this year. The conversation continues in a new morph over on Discord! Please join us there for a more active conversation and the occasional opportunity to ask developers questions directly! Go to the PS+ Discord Server.

Ship Deck plans..

54 posts / 0 new
Last post
Zoolimar Zoolimar's picture
You probably don't want to have a bridge exposed (See previous discussion about radiation shielding). It would be better to place bridge between cargo storage and fuel tanks using both as additional protection. You can add cameras and maybe even observational modules on it's sides for biomorph crews (Synthmorps or infomorphs with drones won't need them). So a ring module with the bridge in the middle. It also seems way too big for this type of ship. At best it should take 5% of ship size and probably even less considering bulk carriers size and intended cargo. It's too big and cheap to need or be able to afford such bridge. The fuel tank size is another matter that is reliant on type of drive used. Default assumptions are metallic hydrogen or fusion drive. As a base Eclipse Phase seems to use torch fusion drives but bulk carriers don't need them and can use more simple and less demanding designs with high dV but low acceleration. Additionally bulk carriers use minimal required speed to reach their destination to save fuel and reduce wear and tear on components which means their fuel tanks won't be that big comparatively to other ship types. So 1/20-1/30 of size is drive. 1/5-1/4 fuel. 1/20-1/30 bridge. Everything else is cargo storage. Well and radiators around fuel tanks and drive system.
ThatWhichNeverWas ThatWhichNeverWas's picture
I hate that I'm taking so much time between posts. Sorry all!
Lazarus wrote:
So back to the initial point, you can't increase the pressure of the hydrogen gas indefinitely. At a certain point the pressure would interfere with sublimation. Thus there is a maximum effective pressure which means a maximum exhaust velocity and a maximum ISP of around 1600. That's why to get the higher ISPs you have to use plasma, fusion, and antimatter drives.
Sure. The Isp of Metallic Hydrogen engines is a functional constant. What you can change is the Thrust, so you're gaining the same DeltaV with a shorter burn.
Lazarus wrote:
Mainly that the idea that the only weight is the mass of the hydrogen and the nozzles is not correct. ... 2.5% of the ship's mass may not seem like these components are taking up much weight but since the nozzle for a metallic hydrogen ship only take up around 3-3.5% of the ship (I'm just guestimatting .5-1% for the mass of the ship for the tank walls) those parts are pretty significant.
What it avoids is the "Mass Tax" of a seperate engine system, and has less plumbing meaning fewer points of failure. Together with the above, this makes MH engines well suited for low Isp, low net mass and/or high thrust designs. In retrospect, it probably would have been wiser to compare MH to solid fuel boosters than to compressed gas. Ah well.[i]*Shrug*.[/i]
ORCACommander wrote:
actually with our current tech level ball bearings are more reliable and longer life than magnetic bearings
Current tech, sure. RL Magnetic Bearings are Significantly hadrer to manufacture and incorporate than they would be in EP.
Zoolimar wrote:
Bridge (or "bridge" in case of infomorphs) of the ship probably has additional internal shielding that can alleviate lesser hits. And any hit by a proton beam that goes through armour layer will bear a risk of charges with varying power levels.
Let's say we have a component in a beam which is inducing a charge of 1 Unit. It's [i]probably[/i] only going to be interacting with a small part of the beam, so only a few percent of the beam's strength is going to be deposited into the component. From that portion of the beam, only a few percent are going to be actually absorbed by the component, with the rest passing through. So for every unit of charge, the beam that's actually penetrating is going to be up to a thousand times stronger. It doesn't stop there. The way Beam armour works is that every "layer" reduces the intensity that passes through by a percentage value, so the more you have the better it gets. For example, the Hull plating values I listed will reduce 120KeV X-Rays by a factor of about 708 and the Combat plating by about 346 [B]Million[/B]. All that energy isn't vanishing – it's being dumped into the ship's armor (at best) and into it's internal components (at worst). So either you're getting hit by a weak (RE: Handheld) beam on an unprotected section – or you're being hit with a VERY powerful one, and the issue of point charges is less vital than the Superconductors becoming less "Super", the internal atmosphere becoming so hot it's causing heatstroke and the aforementioned flesh-boiling. As a general guideline, any weapon storng enough to penetrate Ship armor is strong enough to reduce it's contents to a fine paste. Also, charged particle weapons are rubbish. They disperse too quickly, are ridiculously vunerable to deflection and magnetic shields make them impotent.
Chernoborg wrote:
I put up a rough sketch of a bulk carrier design I've been working on. Would this http://eclipsephase.com/sites/default/files/bulkcarrier01_1_0.jpg be like what you're looking for? I'm working on putting labels and explanations on there, as well as probably moving the bridge module to its own page, but I've been itching to get it on here for a while now.
A decent start at the very least. I'm looking forward to seeing where you go with it :D
In the past we've had to compensate for weaknesses, finding quick solutions that only benefit a few. But what if we never need to feel weak or morally conflicted again?
Chernoborg Chernoborg's picture
ThatWhichNeverWas wrote:A
ThatWhichNeverWas wrote:
A decent start at the very least. I'm looking forward to seeing where you go with it :D
Thanks! Most of the design is educated guesswork regarding fuel tanks and powerplant size. I've been keeping an eye towards treating them like a set for people to move around in - accessways inside the truss to get places, dark corners to hide in, that sort of thing...while also being practical. I've just posted a couple other ship designs, http://eclipsephase.com/sites/default/files/StandardTransport1b.jpg and http://eclipsephase.com/sites/default/files/Destroyer1a.jpg
Current Status: Highly Distracted building Gatecrashing systems in Universe Sandbox!